In July 13th, after the malicious hijacking of Baidu, Sogou was defeated by the end of May, the dog refused to perform the decision and apologized. Baidu has applied for enforcement to the Haidian District people's court in Beijing, which is now accepted by the court.
The dispute between Sogou and Baidu's traffic hijacking began in 2014. Some netizens found that Sogou input method will automatically pop up a drop-down word related to keyword search in the search box of the Baidu search box, and the user clicks on any of the drop-down words of the search keyword. The result page.
In this regard, Baidu believes that Sogou's action against fair, honest and credit commercial ethics, seriously interfered with the normal use of Baidu search, infringing the rights and interests of the Baidu Inc, and thus the court.
In 2015, a trial by the Haidian court decided that the hijacking of Sogou had constituted unfair competition, ordered the Sogou to stop the hijacking immediately, make a public apology on the homepage of the website and compensate Baidu for its economic loss of 500 thousand yuan. Sogou refused to accept the first instance judgment and appealed again. In May 25, 2018, the court made a final judgment and upheld the original judgment of the first instance.
In this regard, Zhu Maolin, a law firm in Beijing, said that the unfair competition between Baidu and Sogou has been decided by the people's court and has already been legally effective. As a loser, the Sogou should perform the court's effective judgment in time. If the search dog refused to perform it, Baidu could In order to apply to the people's court for enforcement, if the search dog has the ability to perform and does not perform, it may be suspected to constitute a crime of refusing to perform a judgment or adjudication. Then the SOGO and its responsible person may be prosecuted for criminal responsibility.